On this Website, I want to highlight several Case Studies to show that what is presented in the Printed Media and on the Airwaves is not necessarily supported by the Data on the Ground.

After a 25-year career in Data management for large US publishers such as Army Times Publishing/Gannett, where I implemented real world solutions based on real world Data (managing all aspects of distributing 250,000 magazines World-Wide 52 weeks out of the year - from a software re-write of an ancient COBOL program of the system to the actual weekly delivering of the magazines), I decided to take a look at what Data supports the "Climate Crisis" narrative we hear so much about, to satisfy my own curiosity about the subject, The more I look into it, the more nothing much adds up, as far as the reporting of Antarctica is Warming Faster than ever, my Data shows just the opposite. That is Strange, No? This is not what I expected to find!

My focus on Data gathering is actual on the ground observations as opposed to Satellite based data, which is what most all of the Media stories are based on. As you can see from the Satalite image below that actually only half of the area over the Oceans have data, for in this case Wind speed and direction, the rest gets interpreted by some Scientist (?) or Graphic Artist (?), who may have a Bias or not, but still ony 50% of it is covered, so what is the Error factor here? The Satalite is up 22,000 feet above the Earth and you expect accuracy from that and reliability? On top of that, the Data and it's interpretation can not easily be fact checked by the average person, so we must just trust the Scientists?

The question these days is how should we calibrate the data? Should we adjust the observations on the ground to match the satellite Data interpretations, or should we adjust the satellite data to match the observational Data on the ground. My opinion would be the latter!

(You can see in the image below that about half of the the over the Ocean area is White - that means there is no Data for that area the Satellite did not pass over that section of the Ocean, so it needs to be interpreted from the nearest ares that does have Data)